Maya Chen is an HR consultant with over 10 years of experience in performance management and organizational development.
It has been described as one of the largest frauds of its nature in the UK.
A total of 14 individuals have been convicted for their part in a multi-million pound scheme to swindle more than 3,500 holiday ownership investors.
The targets were keen to get out of age-old vacation property deals and went looking for assistance.
The majority were in the age range of 60 and 80. Over 500 of them surrendered in excess of £10,000, and a single victim handed over in excess of £80,000.
Those targeted were faced high-pressure consultations extending for six hours. They were financially worse off, holding worthless fake "points" and continued to be bound by expensive vacation property deals they often use.
The firm at the heart of the scheme was the organization in question. They accepted customers' funds to fund the directors' luxurious way of life of exclusive education, millionaire mansions and personal aircraft.
The leader at the top of the organization, the company director, was handed a 90-month prison term in January for deceptive scheme.
On Friday, his wife another individual was one of the final three to receive sentencing.
She was handed a 24-month suspended prison term at the London court after admitting financial crime.
This has been a extended wait and represents a major victory for the people who spoke out, the authorities and prosecutors.
I first heard about the company was in the mid-2016. The position was in the research department of a media outlet, making current affairs programmes.
A acquaintance mentioned that his mother had inherited the use of a timeshare apartment in Spain and, after years of holidays, had started seeking to get out of the agreement.
It should be noted how common holiday ownership had become with English tourists in the eighties and nineties.
Vacation properties permitted families to use the identical property every year, or trade their vacation periods with additional holders who had properties in different locations. Roughly 600,000 vacation seekers seized that option.
The first timeshare rush was accompanied by a many stories about unscrupulous sellers fraudulently marketing properties. They were regularly featured on investigative shows.
The standard timeshare contract locked buyers for long periods.
In that period, those holders who had used their regular accommodation in the resort for a long time were advancing in years, and a significant number were attempting to wave goodbye to their vacation investments.
Several had declining mobility and found it difficult to access their properties. A few just thought they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had deceased, in many cases leaving their heirs to assume the agreements - plus their yearly fees and maintenance fees.
And that's where the relative had found herself. She searched the web for solutions and discovered SMT, a firm whose website claimed to terminate her deal.
Yet, having paid a fee and booked a meeting with them, her relatives smelled a rat.
Further research uncovered hundreds of people saying they had paid money and achieved no result from the service. In fact, they had lost money. Substantial amounts.
The reporting group started looking into what was occurring. It soon emerged that there were questionable operators working within the timeshare resale sector.
One lawyer had numerous client reports waiting to sue the organization.
The team interviewed individuals who had engaged the company and they collectively described identical situations. They assumed the company would acquire their investment off them but when they went to a consultation (for which they paid up front) they were advised there was no re-sale value.
In place of that, they were pushed - in fact pressured - to invest additional funds purchasing "the company's points system", named after the outfit's parent company, the overarching entity.
The precise definition was somewhat vague. They sounded like a form of credit, giving access to discount travel and amenities and consumer discounts.
And they were apparently "tradable" with additional holders, some time down the line.
Paying cash at the time would lead to an future return that would pay for the company's charges and result in the investor in profit, released finally from their troublesome contract.
An unbelievable offer? Well, yes.
If these accounts were accurate, this was a large-scale fraud.
The technique is termed a "deceptive marketing."
A business - specifically the organization - "attracts the consumer by promoting a defined offering and then claim it is unavailable, steering the customer to a different, lower-quality product or service.
Such practices are unlawful. Equipped with all the accounts we had gathered, we presented the rationale to covertly record one of the firm's consultations.
This takes dedication, work, and clear arguments for why this is the sole method to collect the evidence necessary to confirm deceptive practices.
With approval secured, our limited crew arranged a consultation with one of the firm's agents in the location.
Acting as a ordinary individual aiming to help his mother out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement
Maya Chen is an HR consultant with over 10 years of experience in performance management and organizational development.