Maya Chen is an HR consultant with over 10 years of experience in performance management and organizational development.
Across several weeks, intimidating communications persisted. Initially, supposedly from an ex-law enforcement official and an ex-military commander, later from the authorities. In the end, one resident asserts he was ordered to law enforcement headquarters and instructed bluntly: stop speaking out or experience severe repercussions.
Shaikh is one of many opposing a high-value project where Dharavi – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – faces bulldozed and transformed by a corporate giant.
"The distinctive community of this area is unparalleled in the world," explains the protester. "Yet the plan aims to destroy our way of life and stop us speaking out."
The narrow alleys of the slum stand in sharp opposition to the towering buildings and Bollywood penthouses that loom over the area. Residences are assembled randomly and frequently lacking adequate facilities, unregulated industries produce dangerous fumes and the air is saturated with the suffocating smell of exposed drainage.
To some, the promise of Dharavi transformed into a developed area of premium apartments, well-maintained green spaces, contemporary malls and homes with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream realized.
"We don't have adequate medical facilities, paved pathways or drainage and there's nowhere for children to play," states a chai seller, fifty-six, who relocated from his home state in 1982. "The single option is to tear it all down and construct proper housing."
Yet certain residents, such as this protester, are fighting against the redevelopment.
Everyone acknowledges that Dharavi, long neglected as unauthorized settlement, is in stark need investment and development. However they worry that this project – absent of community input – is one that will transform premium city property into an elite enclave, forcing out the lower-caste, immigrant populations who have lived there since the nineteenth century.
These were these excluded, migrant workers who built up the vacant wetlands into a widely studied marvel of local enterprise and commercial output, whose output is worth between one million dollars and two million dollars a year, making it one of the world's largest unregulated sectors.
Of the roughly a million residents living in the packed 2.2 square kilometer neighborhood, a minority will be able for alternative accommodation in the project, which is estimated to take a significant period to accomplish. Additional residents will be relocated to wastelands and salt plains on the far outskirts of the city, risking fragment a generations-old community. Some will not get residences at all.
Residents permitted to continue living in the area will be given units in tower blocks, a substantial change from the natural, communal way of residing and operating that has sustained Dharavi for so long.
Commercial activities from clothing production to pottery and material recovery are expected to shrink in number and be relocated to a designated "commercial zone" distant from people's residences.
For those such as Shaikh, a craftsman and multi-generational inhabitant to reside in the slum, the redevelopment presents a fundamental risk. His informal, three-storey operation makes apparel – formal jackets, luxury coats, studded bomber jackets – distributed in high-end shops in the city's affluent areas and abroad.
Relatives resides in the accommodations below and laborers and sewers – laborers from other states – live on-site, permitting him to afford their labour. Away from the slum, housing costs are often significantly more expensive for minimal space.
Within the government offices in the vicinity, an illustrated mock-up of the transformation initiative depicts an alternative outlook. Fashionable people mill about on bicycles and electric vehicles, purchasing international baked goods and breakfast items and socializing on a terrace outside a coffee shop and treat station. This represents a stark contrast from the 20-rupee idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that sustains the neighborhood.
"This is not development for us," explains Shaikh. "It represents a huge land development that will render it impossible for our community to continue."
Additionally, there exists concern of the development company. Headed by a powerful tycoon – a leading figure and a supporter of the Indian prime minister – the conglomerate has been subject to claims of crony capitalism and ethical concerns, which it rejects.
Although local authorities describes it as a collaborative effort, the corporation invested nearly a billion dollars for its majority share. A lawsuit claiming that the redevelopment was questionably assigned to the developer is pending in India's supreme court.
Since they began to actively protest the project, local opponents assert they have been experienced an extended period of coercion and warning – including phone calls, explicit warnings and insinuations that opposing the project was equivalent to speaking against the country – by individuals they claim are associated with the developer.
Part of the group suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c
Maya Chen is an HR consultant with over 10 years of experience in performance management and organizational development.