Maya Chen is an HR consultant with over 10 years of experience in performance management and organizational development.
Throughout the previous race for the White House, Donald Trump courted the electorate with pledges to reduce prices immediately upon taking office. However, once he assumed office, he seemed to pay precious little attention to affordability issues. This shifted following price-fatigued voters expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Within days, the Trump administration launched a slapdash campaign to tackle affordability. Regrettably, this initiative is a disorganized endeavor—filled with illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and misleading statements.
Just two days post-election, the president kicked off his cost-reduction push with a disastrous statement: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” This comment from billionaire Trump—who frequently associates with other ultra-rich individuals—revealed utter contempt for millions of Americans who struggle when visiting supermarkets. In effect, he dismissed their struggles as trivial, suggesting they were mistaken about actual costs.
His assertion about declining prices was absurdly obtuse and inaccurate. How could all costs be falling when the taxes he imposed were increasing prices? Recent data show the cost of bananas rose 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices went up 14.7%, and coffee prices jumped by nearly 19%—partly due to import taxes applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, prices rose in five of the six food categories tracked by the Consumer Price Index, including meats, poultry, and fish (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (up 1.3%).
In spite of these numbers, Trump persists in repeating his big lie about affordability. After the vote, he has claimed there is “virtually no inflation,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” Such remarks ignore the fact that prices overall have unarguably risen since Biden left office. Currently, inflation is running at a 3 percent per year, which is 50% higher than the Federal Reserve’s target of 2 percent. In another falsehood, he claimed that fuel costs had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, even though government figures indicate they are over three dollars.
Confronted by reality and lower approval ratings, advisers apparently warned that his “prices are down” rhetoric made him sound disconnected from typical Americans. A lot of voters are frustrated about prices continuing to climb after assurances of decreases. In response, advisers suggested one quick fix: roll back certain import taxes. This sensible idea contradicted Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for American shoppers.
With certain taxes being rolled back on several food items, Trump will likely announce that he has cut prices once those foods begin to fall in price. This would be similar to a firestarter taking credit for extinguishing a blaze that he had started. In another instance, while speaking fast-food leaders, he stated that “we are in the peak period of America” and assured the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans who are struggling—particularly when millions face cuts to nutrition assistance or skyrocketing health premiums.
Per a recent poll conducted last fall, 74% of Americans think economic conditions are mediocre or bad, while just a quarter rate them positive. Another poll found that 61% of Americans say Trump’s policies have “made the economy worse” in the country.
Scott Bessent, Trump’s top economic official, lately disputed assertions of a golden age. He stated that far from booming, certain sectors of the American economy “have contracted.” The manufacturing sector—which Trump vowed to save—appears to have contracted for eight months in a row and shed approximately 33,000 jobs since January. Pointing to these challenges, the secretary called on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates—a move that could ease financial pressure.
In response to widespread concern about affordability, the president suggested a direct payment of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” not for “high income people.” To numerous struggling Americans, this sounds like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that Congress—concerned about large shortfalls—will approve such a plan. The scheme would likely raise government expenditure, push up interest rates, and possibly fuel inflation by injecting cash into consumers’ pockets.
Another proposed solution for cost issues centered on introducing 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that they could lower housing costs. However, the truth is that 50-year mortgages would do little to lower monthly payments—frequently reducing them by just $100 or $200 each month. The drawback is that these mortgages could significantly increase the overall cost homeowners pay and slow their accumulation of equity.
In their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have again blamed the previous president for economic problems, such as rising prices. Spokespeople stated they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “addressing Biden’s inflation.” These are unfounded and untruthful claims. In reality, the former president left a robust economic situation, with inflation way down, economic growth strong, and minimal joblessness. However, the current administration’s actions—particularly import taxes—have resulted in an economic mess, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.
According to an economist, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are experiencing economic decline, with their conditions worsened by Trump’s tariffs. He worries that if key regions such as major economies enter a downturn, the nation could face a widespread recession. In downturns, consumers typically have reduced funds to spend, and inflation often falls. Unfortunately, with the highly-touted cost initiative likely to do little to control costs, his primary method for improving living standards might prove to be pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that struggling Americans really can’t afford.
Maya Chen is an HR consultant with over 10 years of experience in performance management and organizational development.